Addepto vs Oxagile: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Addepto (4.2/5) edges ahead of Oxagile (3.8/5) overall. Addepto is the better choice for mid-market companies in finance, energy, or retail needing bespoke ML models with full data pipeline support and sector-specific regulatory awareness. Oxagile is the stronger option for media, AdTech, and sports companies needing ML with deep video processing and computer vision integration backed by 20+ years of video technology expertise. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Addepto vs Oxagile: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Addepto | Oxagile |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2005 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | New York, NY, USA |
| Team size | 50–200 | 250–500 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Mid-market companies in finance, energy, or retail needing bespoke ML models with full data pipeline support and sector-specific regulatory awareness | Media, AdTech, and sports companies needing ML with deep video processing and computer vision integration backed by 20+ years of video technology expertise |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, T&M, Dedicated team | Fixed project, T&M, Dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K | $25K |
| Primary tech stack | Python, TensorFlow, PyTorch | TensorFlow, PyTorch, OpenCV |
| Industries served | fintech, energy, retail, manufacturing, logistics | media, advertising, retail, sports, healthcare |
Addepto vs Oxagile: overview
Addepto
Addepto is a Poland-based AI consulting and development firm focused on end-to-end machine learning solutions for mid-market and enterprise clients. The company specializes in building data pipelines, custom ML models, and decision-support tools with particular depth in financial services, energy, and retail — industries where regulatory awareness and data governance are non-negotiable. Addepto covers the full stack from data engineering through model development, deployment, and integration.
Oxagile
Oxagile is a custom software development vendor founded in 2005 and headquartered in New York, with delivery centers in Eastern Europe. The company has 20+ years of video domain expertise and has applied machine learning to video understanding, visual search, and real-time video analytics for clients in media, advertising, sports, and retail. Oxagile's ML practice is particularly strong in use cases where video processing is the core data source.
Services and capabilities: Addepto vs Oxagile
| Capability | Addepto | Oxagile |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML development | ✓ | ✓ |
| ML consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deep learning | ✓ | ✓ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Computer vision | ✗ | ✓ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Predictive analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data engineering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Addepto vs Oxagile
| Framework / platform | Addepto | Oxagile |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | ✓ | ✓ |
| PyTorch | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scikit-Learn | ✓ | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| AWS SageMaker | N/A | N/A |
| Azure ML | N/A | N/A |
| GCP Vertex AI | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Apache Spark | ✓ | N/A |
| MLflow | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Addepto vs Oxagile
| Criterion | Addepto | Oxagile |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K | $25K |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, T&M, Dedicated team | Fixed project, T&M, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Addepto vs Oxagile
| Dimension | Addepto | Oxagile |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | fintech, energy, retail | media, advertising, retail |
| Best use cases | Credit risk scoring and fraud detection model development for fintech platforms, Energy demand forecasting and grid optimization using time-series ML models | Video content analysis ML for content moderation, tagging, or recommendation, Computer vision model development for sports performance analysis |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Addepto vs Oxagile: pros and cons
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine depth in finance and energy ML — not a generalist firm claiming vertical expertise |
| + | Covers the full stack from data pipeline architecture through model deployment |
| + | Generative AI capability alongside classical ML for hybrid solution architectures |
| + | Warsaw delivery hub provides competitive rates with EU-based data handling |
| + | Accessible minimum engagement for early-stage ML projects or POCs |
| - | Smaller team than enterprise-tier firms; large-scale concurrent programmes may strain capacity |
| - | Less US-based client management than North American competitors |
| - | Limited public case studies compared to larger firms with dedicated marketing teams |
| Oxagile | |
|---|---|
| + | 20+ years of video technology expertise is a genuinely rare differentiator in the ML market |
| + | NVIDIA CUDA expertise for GPU-accelerated video ML inference at production scale |
| + | AdTech ML specialization for audience targeting and real-time bidding optimization models |
| + | WebRTC and live video stream processing capability alongside batch video analysis |
| + | Eastern European delivery with New York client-facing presence |
| - | Video-first specialization means less breadth for non-video ML use cases |
| - | Less generative AI LLM tooling depth compared to AI-first firms |
| - | Limited public case studies outside media, AdTech, and sports verticals |
Who should choose Addepto?
Addepto is the right choice for mid-market companies in finance, energy, or retail needing bespoke ML models with full data pipeline support and sector-specific regulatory awareness.
End-to-end AI/ML delivery with particular sector depth in financial services and energy — industries that require compliance sophistication alongside technical capability. Minimum engagement starts at $20K. Works best with clients in fintech, energy, retail, manufacturing, logistics.
Who should choose Oxagile?
Oxagile is the right choice for media, AdTech, and sports companies needing ML with deep video processing and computer vision integration backed by 20+ years of video technology expertise.
20+ years of video domain expertise uniquely positions Oxagile for ML use cases involving video understanding, visual search, and real-time video analytics. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in media, advertising, retail, sports, healthcare.
Decision matrix: Addepto vs Oxagile
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Addepto |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Addepto |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Addepto |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Addepto |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Addepto |
Use case fit: Addepto vs Oxagile
| Use case | Addepto fit | Oxagile fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit risk scoring and fraud detection model development for fintech platforms | Strong | Limited | Addepto |
| Energy demand forecasting and grid optimization using time-series ML models | Strong | Limited | Addepto |
| Video content analysis ML for content moderation, tagging, or recommendation | Limited | Strong | Oxagile |
| Computer vision model development for sports performance analysis | Limited | Strong | Oxagile |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Addepto vs Oxagile
Addepto (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. End-to-end AI/ML delivery with particular sector depth in financial services and energy — industries that require compliance sophistication alongside technical capability. It is best for mid-market companies in finance, energy, or retail needing bespoke ML models with full data pipeline support and sector-specific regulatory awareness.
Oxagile (3.8/5) is the better choice when media, AdTech, and sports companies needing ML with deep video processing and computer vision integration backed by 20+ years of video technology expertise. If your situation matches those criteria, Oxagile is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Addepto vs Oxagile FAQ
Is Addepto better than Oxagile?
Addepto (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Addepto is better for mid-market companies in finance, energy, or retail needing bespoke ML models with full data pipeline support and sector-specific regulatory awareness. Oxagile is better for media, AdTech, and sports companies needing ML with deep video processing and computer vision integration backed by 20+ years of video technology expertise.
How do Addepto and Oxagile differ in pricing?
Addepto uses fixed project, t&m, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K. Oxagile uses fixed project, t&m, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Addepto or Oxagile?
Oxagile is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Addepto and Oxagile?
Addepto's primary differentiator is: end-to-end ai/ml delivery with particular sector depth in financial services and energy — industries that require compliance sophistication alongside technical capability. Oxagile's primary differentiator is: 20+ years of video domain expertise uniquely positions oxagile for ml use cases involving video understanding, visual search, and real-time video analytics. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 250–500), minimum engagement ($20K vs $25K), and primary industries served (fintech, energy vs media, advertising).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.